Bang your pan at Evita!
"I banged my pan at Evita [reference to Eva Peron - allusion to Cristina Kirchner] ...and it felt good!"
Argentinean farmers are objecting to president Cristina Kirchner over tax increases on agricultural exports and her apparent intention to create a rift between the poor and the farmers. After three weeks of severe strikes, which have left the country paralysed, the workers have agreed to start negotiations.
Argentinean farmers are going back to work. The pan banging, road blocks and food shortages are over. And within a month, crop produce will be back on the shelves, giving Kirchner enough time to show her goodwill in negotiations. There's a lot of pressure on the government. The past three weeks have left a country that boasts "the best meat in the world", without any meat at all, never mind fresh produce.
Heckles started in the "campo" (countryside) shortly after Kirchner's government announced a tax increase on the export of soy products - a measure hoped to help curb inflation created by the hike in the price of raw materials on the international market.
Many Argentineans are now branding Kirchner's politics as "populist" because she's pitting the working classes against the farmers, who are presented as privileged, in the dispute. The president is accused of playing on fears created by the food shortages. "You can't be with the people and cut off their food supply" she said when the protests began.
Posted by "DocThurman" 26 March 08
Most of the protestors are from the urban middle-class. Some appear to support the farmers; others seem to be disgruntled with the government in general.Cristina Civale is a journalist and writer from Buenos Aires:
This strike
was way over the top. The agricultural sector, which has a history of earning
the most money, shouldn't cut people off from essential products like milk. We
saw litres of milk thrown in the street during the road blocks, and the
needless slaughter of chickens by way of protest.
You have to understand that the major manufacturers were not involved - they trade directly with industry - it was the small producers who blocked the roads and their kids, who study in the city centre, who banged their pots and pans in protest...
There are also people who are protesting against the Cristina Kirchner's authoritarian and pretentious attitude. Personally I'm not supporting the strike, but I have to say I don't get the way the president acts towards to the people.
Musgrave is an Argentinean economist:
The tax
increases on the export of soy products is a way for the state to take
advantage the benefits of tax in a sector where tax evasion is a problem. Thanks
to high costs on the foreign market, farmers are earning extraordinary amounts,
and the government intends to draw from this in order to be able to stop, in
effect, the high prices of foodstuffs on the country's domestic market.
Obviously, they made some political mistakes when they announced these
measures.The news provoked an excessive reaction from the
agricultural sector, which felt discriminated against and disadvantaged. The
biggest criticism against the government was that large and small producers
were not differentiated between. The most recent measures, announced last
Monday, solve a part of this problem, because they propose a subsidy system for
smaller producers. That should help to appease the situation a lot.
Posted by "Yo Canibal" 28 March 08
Defending the people of the campo's way of life and freedom, doesn't really evoke any pity.
Commentaires
Some details worth bearing in mind
Soumis par Cuiviewen (non vérifié) le ven, 06/06/2008 - 20:33.I´m a 32-year-old Argentinian and I can openly say I support the farmers. I do not support them because I´m wealthy and profit from the agricultural produce. I support them because what they claim is fair. There are endless little towns, villages and bigger cities in the provinces that live off agriculture, and the fact that I live in a big city allows me to see that we have no idea whatsoever about what the provinces would face if this tax were allowed to take its course. The money levied by means of this tax would not go back to the provinces, as it is 'no coparticipable', meaning that it will be used in its entirety at the discretion of the president, who openly dislikes farmers. She continuously refers to them as right-wing, greedy, and irresponsible... But I can assure you I have never seen such a stubborn behaviour in a president, turning this into a personal fight, which will clearly make us all lose. There is something that worries me above all... she clearly favours populist groups of unemployed people (though their leaders earn thousands of dollars a month as newly-appointed government officials), and she spends lavish amounts on welfare plans, which are handed out by local politicians at their discretion, even giving plans to their own relatives who are not unemployed. These politicians then force the benefitiaries of the plans to attend political rallies, campaigns, demonstrations, acting as rent-a-mobs, etc. So my question is... a party/government that use these welfare plan benefitiaries as their underlying force, as their strong popular arm, will ever want them to get jobs? Will they ever allow these 'followers' to take up a craft, a trade, to work and earn their own salaries so that they learn how good it feels to provide for your own children? Will they ever foster their real inclusion, their access to a good education, to university studies? I believe the answer is no. This government is using them. This government wants them to remain unhappy, ignorant, easily manipulated. Did you know that it is hard for farmers to find workers in the provinces who are willing to work legally, because most get welfare plans and so they need to work illegally... the plan is not good enough and at the same time stops them from getting real jobs? Farmers want to work, that´s what they do rain or shine all year long. And yes, there are wealthy owners of large farms involved in the protests... and there are also several incredibly wealthy farm owners WITHIN the government, the trade union leaders, and all of their relatives. This country needs to leave hipocrisy aside, and protect those who want to work and make this country a better place. Unfortunately, we seem to be getting the results we deserve for not working together... I just hope this does not lead us into violence. TODOS somos campo!
Utilisateur non inscrit