And the prize for Best Actress?! We’re not entirely sure…

Iran's International Fajr Film Festival was hosted in Tehran last week for the 26th time. But pictures from this year's edition of the popular festival offered an unusual view of the showbiz affair. The FARS news agency blurred out the faces of female guests, making them almost unrecognisable. Our Observer for Iran, feminist Farnaz Seifi, explains why.

UPDATE (17.30 15 Feb. 08): Thanks to comments on this post, we have found photos posted by the Fars agency where actresses' faces are not blurred. The photos are part of a different set found at a seperate link. This would suggest that the agency has no consistent policy on whether or not their photographers can show the faces of female actresses.

Actresses Ladan Mostofi, Masomeh Mir Hoseini and Nazanin Mofkham

Photos from the FARS news agency posted on Arash Kamangir's blog.

Portrait de Farnaz Seifi

Farnaz Seifi

  • Journalist and feminist activist

“Women: go home and stay there”

Commentary from our Iranian Observer, feminist Farnaz Seifi, who recently left the country to move to Europe:

This is a new concept brought in by the current government. We've never seen such a thing before! But the agency who's published these photos is very conservative and very close to the government. Their message to women is to go home and stay there. Do the cooking and look after the children. They don't want women to be active in society- they don't believe there is the need. Actresses wear a lot of make-up and colourful clothes. They're also usually quite beautiful, and the government doesn't want people to see this. If films are put on the TV, which is state-owned, they censor everything. You don't even know what some films are about they're so heavily censored. It's ridiculous.

This policy comes at a time when women are facing punishment for not wearing a headscarf in the street [video: Fashion crackdown intensifies: arrests captured on film]. For first-time offenses they receive a letter, but after that it's a fiscal fine. The government is also using other strategies to minimise women. For example, they're trying to cut the current rate of 63% of women in universities to 50%. They say admissions must be limited. These changes...the current government is simply against women in every way. With the old president, Mohammad Khatami, we had some hope. But now, things are getting worse everyday for women in Iran."

Portrait de Arash Kamangir

Arash Kamangir

  • Canada
  • Blogger

Commentaires

About the Discussion

I just wanted to point out that having received many comments, under a few different names, I think this is nothing more than one individual making all these accusations. I refer you to the comment posted on my blog under the name "GIJoe"
(http://kamangir.net/2008/02/10/the-problem-with-attractive-actresses/#co...)
Knowing that a controversial Iranian blogger (http://i.hoder.com/) posted the link to this post on his blog under the title "Farnaz Seifi and Arash Abadpour [that's me] serving the anti-Iran campaign of Nikolas Sarkozy", I believe many of the responses here are originating from the same source.

Portrait de Arash Kamangir

Arash Kamangir

  • Canada
  • Blogger

Can these ladies demand a public apology from Fars News?

Hello Sir,
Maybe you should mention to the people who accuse you of being selective that the main point of your article is that Fars News published blurry photos of Iranian actresses. What I like to know is why Fars News would do such a thing. One person on the thread says” there are pictures of actresses on TV and magazines" which begs the question why Far News decided to blur those pictures? We need to avoid getting involved in ideological arguments and negative nationalism and instead focus on the issue at hand. I like to know who allowed Fars news to publish those photos. Is there a policy that demands pictures of pretty actresses must be blurred out? Also I like to know if the law allows these artists to sue the publisher and the photographer for insulting their person by publishing those photos. Can those actresses sue the publisher for unlawfully distorting their picture? Can they ask for a public apology? In the West when things like this happen people can ask for explanation or a public apology. For example in situation in which a tabloid magazine misquotes an actor or actress, prints unsubstantiated news about an artist or when a tabloid magazine prints a damaging photo the artists involve can demand apologies or even sue. So I ask my question again: can these ladies who, in my opinion, have been humiliated demand for a public apology from Fars News?
Cheers

Utilisateur non inscrit

Thanks for the update

To the Editors,
Thanks for the update of Feb 15. However, I am afraid it does not go far enough.
The whole premise of your source is built on this agency blurring out photographs of beautiful women because the government does not want people to see them.
The argument fails on two fronts. First, the Agency clearly does show their faces and the authors were selective about the pictures they showed here. Secondly, these are actresses whose faces are all over movie screens all over the country. If the government did not want their faces to be seem, it would keep their movies from showing. Clearly that is not the case.
My advise to you is not to buy into whatever some shill feeds you. Think about what you are publishing. It does not make sense to have still pictures of actresses blurred when their faces are all over the movie theater.
Also, having a blog or being a "feminist" is not enough to consider someone an expert, observer or source. Your website is being used for people with an agenda without you knowing about it. I think you should remove this article altogether.
Better luck next time.

Utilisateur non inscrit

Only a sexual pervert would

Only a sexual pervert would blur the closeup picture of a woman. What kind of people may get sexual satisfaction by looking at a face? Shame on you...

Utilisateur non inscrit

Response

Sir,
You state that "the authors were selective about the pictures they showed here". This argument is wrong. We were not selective in our assertion that in that thread there is no closeup of women which is not blurred (http://www.farsnews.com/imgrep.php?nn=8611210101).
You say "It does not make sense to have still pictures of actresses blurred when their faces are all over the movie theater". For that argument you need to analyze the way closeups of the actresses are treated in the movies.
You call the contributors to this item "people with an agenda". More information in that respect will be much appreciated.
Furthermore, I am still waiting for a response to my latest answer to your comments:
http://observers.france24.com/en/content/20080214-prize-best-actress-we%...

Portrait de Arash Kamangir

Arash Kamangir

  • Canada
  • Blogger

it a great picec of work !

it a great picec of work ! well done :-)

Pity Iran still ruled by such a narrow minded Muslim fundamentalists !

wish all Iranian , democracy , freedom and a better life in the near future

Utilisateur non inscrit

Selective indeed

For a non blurred pictures of the same people who are supposedly blurred by FARS News see

Azita Hadjian
http://www.farsnews.com/plarg.php?nn=M295003.jpg
Ladan Mostofi
http://www.farsnews.com/plarg.php?nn=M295004.jpg
Naznin Mafkham
http://www.farsnews.com/plarg.php?nn=M295009.jpg
Niki Karimi
http://www.farsnews.com/plarg.php?nn=M295013.jpg

Same website, same event.

Utilisateur non inscrit

Not Selective

Sir,
The pictures you have provided have been taken by Hossein Salmanzadeh, as it is shown at the bottom of them. The photographer of the pictures we have taken is Alireza Jalalifar, a different person. The two events are also different. What we have referred to is an event which took place in the morning (http://www.farsnews.com/imgrep.php?nn=8611210101), where the movie "Hibernation" was talked about. The page you have picked happened in the afternoon of the next day and was about the movie "Suicide Mission for Allah" (http://www.farsnews.com/imgrep.php?nn=8611220394).
We have never claimed that this is a policy in Fars. Nevertheless, I refer you to the post below as another indication that Fars News has a habit of not liking pictures of ladies (http://kamangir.net/2007/08/13/too-sexy-for-fars-news/).

Portrait de Arash Kamangir

Arash Kamangir

  • Canada
  • Blogger

photographer?

Sir,

Surely you must know that the decision of what ends up on a news agency's website is not up to the photographer but to the editorial board. The photographer has no say in this whatsoever. To even mention the photographer is to try to get yourself out of a hole you dug for yourself by having an agenda and not being very good at twisting reality.

Utilisateur non inscrit

absolutely selective

Your accusation is not against the photographer but against the news agency (Fars in this case). Now you are saying it was a different photographer. So what? Here is a quote from the article:
"But the agency who's published these photos is very conservative and very close to the government."
The agency is who you are accusing not the photographer. And that agency, clearly has published pictures of the same people which are not blurred.

Utilisateur non inscrit

Not Selective

Sir,
you claimed that the set you have provided has been shot in the "same event". That is wrong. What we have referred to is the tendency in the agency to censor pictures of ladies. I have provided more evidence in here: http://kamangir.net/2007/08/13/too-sexy-for-fars-news/

Portrait de Arash Kamangir

Arash Kamangir

  • Canada
  • Blogger

I think arresting women for

I think arresting women for not covering their heads is outrageous... and this kind of mentality is exported to the west as well, where islamists in western societies raise their sons to beleive that whatever woman is uncovered is a whore. I live in a western society in a western city, where actually 51% of the population is moslem. Being a western woman, I am sick and tired and very angry with constantly being harassed on the street by teenage moslem boys, who think they have a right to call me names because I am not wearing a headscarf. And it not only verbal harrassement: the other day I was passing through a neighborhood that is characteristically islamic - you see the women covered from head to toe - and a 14-15 yr old boy grabbed my private parts and blocked my way calling me names like whore and asking me how much it is, while his pals were laughing and jeering. I had to push them violently in order to run away, while shouting at some older men to come and dicipline the boys. No one moved and no one interfeered. There are different examples as well, for example men forbidding me to talk to their covered wives while we are shopping, and pulling their wife away from me. Whenever I mention my outrage with these incidencies, I get the reply 'well, you shouldn't go to their neighborhoods'. This is an appeal to everyone to start discussing this taboo issue of islamic morals harassing western women in western socities! We have to start talking about how much it bothers us, in order to get it to stop!

Utilisateur non inscrit

Blurring the face of a

Blurring the face of a famous female actress would not hide her beauty or her allure for the people. Even if you visit the homes of religious clerics, they will tell you that these actresses are beautiful, sophisticated, and a symbol of the artistic and social society in which Iranians live but they need to cover themselves up- the idea of covering up women, and hiding them away from the grip of a male-dominated society ignores the implications; men are weak and bound to take advantage of women, women are incapable of guarding and living their own lives without a male patriarch. It's just an age-old mindset, worlds apart from the one that I grew up in (the States) and that you live in.

After blurring their faces, will they have more control over the perspective that the average Iranian has towards beauty and towards their own sexual aggressions? I don't think so...they have just begun expanding their DSL internet system in Tehran- the Internet has no qualms against a gorgeous face or body.

In Iran, young boys already know about sex, flirting, and girls...even the religious children brought up within the shadow of a Mosque. There's no blurring tool built into the human psyche- instinct will gradually wear away at those young men and women and they will realize that it's just a scare tactic. They already do...now we just wonder what will happen next.

Thanks for posting about this issue, my goodness, there are many issues ignored by the world and this is one of them- it may seem trivial but it's a window to the world that Iranians live in...the Fajr Film Festival is one of the most famous in Iran, that all walks of life enjoy- so it's not just an issue that Liberal Iranians or Hardline Iranians are impacted by!

Utilisateur non inscrit

nothing but lies

"Our observer in Iran" who "recently left the country" (!) says:

"Actresses wear a lot of make-up and colourful clothes. They're also usually quite beautiful, and the government doesn't want people to see this"

Yet they allow their movies to be played in every movie theater in the country, allows a film festival with their full participation and gives them awards.
Your lies are absurd. They are actresses for crying out loud. How can the government want people not to see them!? Get a real job. Whoever is paying you to write this drivel is getting ripped off. Does this site have an editorial policy or an editor who checks things for consistency? Apparently not.

Utilisateur non inscrit

RE: AAA

RE: "Get a real job. Whoever is paying you to write this drivel is getting ripped off. Does this site have an editorial policy or an editor who checks things for consistency? Apparently not."

Here at the Observers we have an editorial policy which is to use experienced sources for information, which we then verify using official sources. Regarding Farnaz Seifi, she is an Iranian feminist who left the country to live in Europe a few months ago.

As we said, the Fars news agency blurred the faces of female actresses from the festival. This can be verified on their website here: http://www.farsnews.com/imgrep.php?nn=8611210101.

Portrait de Team Observers

Team Observers

  • France
  • Journaliste

To team observer

You are being selective about your presentation. On the same website about the same event there are many pictures of actresses whose face has not been blurred, as some other commentator has already posted. So the questions remains why are you being selective? The blurred pictures are clearly meant to focus on the name tag sitting in front of the attendees.
In the link you provide and make accusations against Fars News, the lady in the first row second column is the same as this one (Ladan Mostofi):
http://www.farsnews.com/plarg.php?nn=M294994.jpg
So why are you not showing this one in your article.

Utilisateur non inscrit

Response

Portrait de Arash Kamangir

Arash Kamangir

  • Canada
  • Blogger

Please stop this nonsese!

I saw these pictures form the same FARS website. Someone please tell me which of these pictures are blurred:
http://www.farsnews.com/plarg.php?nn=M294994.jpg
http://www.farsnews.com/plarg.php?nn=M295000.jpg
http://www.farsnews.com/plarg.php?nn=M295001.jpg
http://www.farsnews.com/plarg.php?nn=M295013.jpg
http://www.farsnews.com/plarg.php?nn=M295018.jpg
http://www.farsnews.com/plarg.php?nn=M295025.jpg

All actors. All beautiful women.
I think more than anything else the photographer had tried to be artistic.

Utilisateur non inscrit

You are just fooling

You are just fooling yourself, you know very well that they blurred the pictures to belittle women actresses, how come no male picture was taken in such an artistic manner?:-)

Utilisateur non inscrit

To the guy who doesn't get fooled

Yeah, you're quite right. All photographers in the Fars news agency and other news agency in Iran are instructed to take pictures of the name tags only. After all this is a "new concept" promoted by the Ahmadinejad brutal and repressive government. This new policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran applies to all types of media being film, television or newspaper: they've been instructed to blur out women in every picture and take picture of their name tags only. Women are instructed to wear name tags for the same purpose. Isn't it what Hitler did to Jews in occupied Europe? :-)

Utilisateur non inscrit

I quote from Ms.

I quote from Ms. Seifi:
"This is a new concept brought in by the current government. We've never seen such a thing before! But the agency who's published these photos is very conservative and very close to the government."
As I understand it from this statement, Ms. Seifi suggests this "new phenomenon" is something that is organized by the government and their mouthpiece, in this case Fars news agency, to suppress women in Iran. Then she goes on talking about other issues that are totally unrelated to these pictures. As I see it Ms Seifi and Mr. "Kamangir" have an axe to grind against the government of Iran and they use every opportunity to discredit the government, even if it means to use a bunch of pictures which were taken by a photographer who had tried to be a little creative.

Utilisateur non inscrit

The Pictures

Sir, the pictures you are talking about have been taken by another photographer and have been posted on another page.
On the thread talked about in here, actresses' pictures have been consistently blurred out (http://pic.kamangir.net/thumbnails.php?album=102).

Utilisateur non inscrit

focus is on the name tags

In every picture you claim it was blurred, the name tag is in focus. The photographer was trying to capture a picture of the name tags sitting in front of the attendees. When you explore other pictures, you will see clearly there are picture of the same women with focus on their faces and not blurred. Besides, why would they do something like this for women whose face is in every movie theater. It seems like a rather silly accusations coming from you. People will do anything to get published on some sites these days.

Utilisateur non inscrit

Response

Sir,
You write "The photographer was trying to capture a picture of the name tags sitting in front of the attendees". Any suggestion why only the name tags of the ladies are important? Any reason why the name tags of men are not important? All, and I emphasize all, the closeup pictures of actresses are blurred out in that thread and none, exactly none, of actors'.

http://www.farsnews.com/imgrep.php?nn=8611210101

Portrait de Arash Kamangir

Arash Kamangir

  • Canada
  • Blogger

btw, The links in the first

btw,
The links in the first comment prove that the pictures have not been "consistently" blurred. Do you even know what "consistently" means?

Utilisateur non inscrit

Kamangir, Your link goes to

Kamangir,

Your link goes to your own website whereas the first commentator's links goes directly to FARS News. You have been exposed as a propagandist. Give it up. You are not very good at it.

Utilisateur non inscrit

Response

Portrait de Arash Kamangir

Arash Kamangir

  • Canada
  • Blogger

do not hate the West!

Reactionary individuals on this thread have completely missed the point of the article! The mistake all you Marxists, leftists and Islamist (combined together you are all reactionary forces to progress, liberty and freedom) make is that you think Western society is flawless! A Western society, like any other society, has flaws but the question you must be asking yourself is what is getting done to address those flows. What I mean is that instead of focusing on mistakes and flaws of the Western societies try for a change to focus on the positive aspects and how Western societies deal with their problems. If you are not blind, deaf and stupid you will see that in the West there are far more opportunities and possibilities (for men and women) and if there are obstacles or issues there are organizations and institutions that have made it their job to constantly scrutinize the behavior of the state and how it treats its citizens and independent media in most cases report on state-citizen relations. Bottom line is, in the West issues get addressed and that is why minorities such as gays and lesbians are not rotting in prison now in the West and instead have rights like you. Of course no issue will ever get addressed 100% right away and that is why you see in the West there are still problems such as gender discrimination or discrimination against minorities such as gays and lesbians. However, the key point is that, in the West, institutions and organizations of civil society keep issues, such as discrimination against gays and lesbian, alive and by doing so they are able to expand the scope of possibilities for such groups over time!

In Iran the idea of an independent media outlet is a joke and both men and women have little access to independent organizations that would, on behalf of them, put pressure on the state. Lastly, your view of women resembles a view of a man from Stone Ages, therefore, I do not expect much from you. But I say this: the place of the woman is not in the kitchen primarily! The place of woman is where she likes it to be and you have little or no right to tell her where that place is!

Utilisateur non inscrit

organizations

Ah ha, always in the West, people say an institution or an organization is going to take care of this or that problem...when you speak of community, like gay community or black community you speak of a common interest political lobby not a real community where people know eachother personally...having lived in Iran I actually preferred the depth of friendship, family and community achieved there to anything I have experienced in the West. I was never alone unless I chose to be. In the West people are so alienated they have to pay therapists to listen.

You were probably not addressing your comments to me but I never said a woman's place was in the home unless that is her choice. I agree no government or religion has the right to dictate that nor am I am Marxist by the way but I do not share your confidence in the ability of institutions and organizations to solve social ills and flaws...I think that consumer culture is deeply flawed...what is American culture? How would you define it? Buying Things...I was not joking when I suggested that families in the West need affordable domestic help...our own Congressmen periodically create scandals when it is discovered they have illegal alien live ins helping run their households...at least servants get paid, most husbands would not be able to afford the services their wives routinely provide for free in addition to working a second job for income...

cheers,

BA

Utilisateur non inscrit