ola dug wrote: Out of all the 300 million people in America, is this really who you want for president – blindly popular with young people, power hungry, deceptive, vague, and coldly self-centered - is there a better definition of a potential Anti-Christ?
_______
I agree that we should judge a person by their actions and not their words. But on a blog, we judge by words and your words discredit you. You obviously don't know anything about the anti-Christ.

You obviously don't speak for 300 million people, most of whom have voted for Obama over Clinton and McCain.

You obviously have no respect for the intellect of young voters, middle-class income and higher voters, well-educated voters, independents and crossover Republican voters, all of whom have voted more for Obama than Clinton.

You obviously are basing your vote on something concealed like prejudice, bias, bigotry or plain ignorance because the unconcealed record doesn't substantiate your contrived, clintonian allegations about Obama and his associations.

Finally, if you are so concerned about America and the world, as opposed to your own race and gender, what has the record exposed about your candidate?