in our religion we have to belive all probhets adam.....moses....,david.. jeasus....and mohammed...it is a bad company for make people angry we know it from danmark.i hope he ll be sad and appologise all muslims and crists and ALLAH forgive him....

If 'Rory' above has no understanding of the reason that Christians are tired of having untalented imbeciles mock and blaspheme their religion, their God and their lifestyles, and having those imbeciles whine and moan about their 'artistic rights' - then perhaps Rory would allow some degenerate artiste to paint a nude of his mother engaging in bestial behavior with swine, and put it on public display. Then, by example, he could show us what 'good Christians' do. The fact is taht he describnes himself as a 'Christian' but thinks it is fine for others to blaspheme the God whom he only claims to serve. That is the essence of hypocrisy.
But in reality let us say 'well done' for the authorities- and for Christians everywhere who will no longer 'go to the back of the bus'.

Centuries and decades ago art was defined by either historical or social acceptable and "redeeming" themes whether that medium be in canvas, sculpture, or fabric. But today, the word "Art" and "Artist" is associated with either the words of "acceptability", "Bohemian," "Anarchist" and even "Religious Expression," etc.

Unfortunately, a great deal of "art expression" and even the artists themselves are, in reality, immoral and amoral as well! They disguise their "belief systems" their unbridled hatred for religion, Christianity in particular under the thinly disguised cloak of "artistry" or "freedom of expression." If you can't get recognition as an artist then you turn towards those themes that offend the common public or shock the sensibilities of the public!

The first amendment's right of "freedom of speech and expression" has been so distorted, or should I say "skewed" that "art" can be freely defined and disguised as anything. I could take snapshots of children in provacative poses that is only one step from being defined as "child pornography" or women in suggestive photographic poses that escapes the defination of pornography by a technicality. THIS is WHAT art has degenerated today! Many of today's moral degenerates become tommorrow's "artists."

Even the Russian society, which is primarily either atheistic or agnostic, recognizes the difference between "freedom of expression," and blatant hatred and the desire to offend and denigrate ALL that is sacred to those who view such "artistic garbage." These pictures do NOT belong in ANY museum to be viewd, instead, there is only one place that these pictures SHOULD be and that is the local land fill where it is in good company with both the garbage and human waste products!