19/05/2008 / CHINA - RUSSIA
It's unlikely that Russia
will launch a legal dispute, and even if it did, it would not likely succeed in
stopping China's
plans or winning compensation. China's
political clout in Moscow
is very strong, perhaps even strong enough to persuade the Russian government
against moving ahead with formal legal action.
In the past when China
had been caught trying to steal weapons, like the Bumblebee rocket launcher, they made the surprising decision to pay
for the weapon. However, the Sukhoi-Shenyang fighter is far larger
and much more expensive.
After counterfeit Levi's, counterfeit fighter jets
It started some 30 years ago with fake Levi's jeans and Versace bags. Then the market became more sophisticated, with faux iPhones on the racks. Now, the Chinese counterfeit goods trade has gone even further, with the production of identical copies of Russian-designed fighter planes.
In 1996, the Chinese government acquired a license to manufacture 200 Su-27 (Sukhoi 27) fighter jets at the Shenyang aircraft factory in northeast China. The planes were supposed to be used by the Chinese air force under the name J-11. But in 2004, after reeling 95 planes off the assembly line, the Chinese authorities suddenly cancelled the contract, listing various faults with the design of the jet. However, in 2007 China started to manufacture a new plane, of "Chinese design", which they named the J-11B. Not surprisingly, it was almost an identical copy of the Su-27, except for the addition of Chinese-produced engines, radars and dashboards.
The Chinese model is much cheaper than the Russian original, and Russia has been quick to note that China hopes to sell it to countries usually supplied by Moscow. The Russian authorities plan to sue for counterfeit theft, but, according to our Observer, Rick Fisher, who specializes in military issues, they have little chance of getting their voices heard.
Contributors
Rick Fisher is a military aviation expert and senior fellow at the International Assessment and Strategy Centre.
It's unlikely that Russia
will launch a legal dispute, and even if it did, it would not likely succeed in
stopping China's
plans or winning compensation. China's
political clout in Moscow
is very strong, perhaps even strong enough to persuade the Russian government
against moving ahead with formal legal action.
In the past when China
had been caught trying to steal weapons, like the Bumblebee rocket launcher, they made the surprising decision to pay
for the weapon. However, the Sukhoi-Shenyang fighter is far larger
and much more expensive.
The J-11B is made to use several of the Su-27/ J-11's components along with the new Chinese-made parts. The Chinese air force values the Russian design, preferring it to their own Chengdu J-10. In 2003, a Russian source told me that he fully expects China to market their "indigenised" Sukhoi aircraft once they succeed in putting it into production.
Will it be competitive? In some respects, yes. My analysis is that it might be as effective as recent, modified Su-27s, the J-11B/Su-30 attacker series. But Russia is not standing still - and its new Su-35 features more powerful engines and an even better radar system. However, for the price, some countries may view the J-11B and J-11BS as a better deal.
It's hard to say where the J-11B currently is in its development cycle. Prototypes have been tested, and the WS-10A — a perhaps even more important accomplishment for China — is in final stages of design, or perhaps even initial production. But right now, the J-11B is not ready for the Chinese Air Force, much less ready for foreign sales. By 2010 or shortly thereafter, however, it could be ready for the Chinese market. And once it has proven itself in the Chinese service for several years, it will likely be on offer for foreign trade.
The original Russian-made Su-27 (Sukhoi 27).
China's version, the J-11.
»
Sign up via 
The Observers TV show
Observers' Tips
What we’re working on now...
Most popular
Comments
China canceled the Su-27K
Submitted by Anonyme (not verified) on Fri, 23/05/2008 - 12:27.China canceled the Su-27K contract just because its avionics are out-dated as well as the availability of much advanced variants like the MKK. To link this issue up with the J-11B project is not quite logical(though is seems to be)
Unregistered user
WS-10A - Real or Bargaining Chip
Submitted by Anonyme (not verified) on Thu, 22/05/2008 - 04:41.No one should doubt China's ability to build some or all of the airframe components that go into the J-11. The engine, however, is another matter. The WS-10A has been the subject of rumor and speculation for over a decade, and it remains to be seen if this engine is real, or fantasy.
I would suggest, however, that even if the WS-10A is a total failure, China will continue to build it up a success story. The "possibility" that China could adopt a domestic engine for future J-11 deliveries, or for deliveries of the J-10 to foreign customers, would buy much needed leverage that could ensure the continued delivery of Russian engines at favorable rates.
Unregistered user