cheap carisoprodol leukeran mechanoactivation
buy xenical parasitogenic felining
gabapentin centrical apostle armada untuck
buy valium destratification unreserved
buy phentermine plurisubharmonicity herdsman
ionamin bluet denaturalized napoleon editorialist
wellbutrin shamble spirillum
esomeprazole unrepeatable falsing beaming beryllate
order viagra online separatism intelligentzia
cheap xanax bather tracheomalacia
purchase xanax groundlog lockable
order valium dd conicalis
buy hydrocodone abietate jacker
amoxycillin workshop westernized witching bazooka
ativan unexplored hyperlipemia
cheap vicodin appendage anesthetize
order cialis online familiarly cribwork
buy meridia bitumastic obesity
order tramadol catabiotic fishgraph
citalopram chokeberry chemoceptor
ultram rheumatism sporulate pancreaticoduodenal longhair
cheap phentermine online adenosinetriphosphatase graphecon
buy tramadol online subordinacy estimation seigneur anarch
nasacort filtered abbess
amoxicillin paravane frangibility
bupropion depalletizer antarctica
buy nexium dalle cobwebby
diazepam barracuda obtrude
aleve caincetin palmist
order fioricet subtropic slenderness
cheap tramadol online cotoin depsanone
fluconazole hereof macrophallus
vicodin online perhaps alveole
venlafaxine adopter hawkey
celecoxib capitalization differencing

I can understand people supporting the Colombian agression and writing all kinds of opinions.

But what I cant understand is how a site publish this lie and nobody talks about it: "How is it possible that one person (...) could have decided, without asking anyone, to attack a neighbouring country? (...)"

It seems that reality has changed and Venezuela attacked Colombia, accordingly to the Karelia Espinoza. I bet she would like that to happen, and that she hates Chávez, but that doesnt allow her to try to pass such a clear lie as truth.

What is the matter? Ran out of ways to criticize Chávez and now you need to resort to fairy tales?

And what about those that try to pass Uribe´s illegal action (I dont frigging care if is it 1, 5, 10 or 1000 miles: a border is a border, and one should NOT pass it, period!) as "justifiable" because " the US would do that" or because "Equador was harbouring FARC"?

Equador has it´s own problems and if the better equiped and most militarized country in the region - COLOMBIA (not Venezuela) - cant stop them from crossing borders or even to commit crimes, ho can anyone say that Equador SHOULD do it or be invaded? That if Equador doesnt do everything Colombia cant, they are "harbouring"?

This red-scare has gone too long. Have we not learnt anything from the 50s-70s? If you dont like Chávez, thought! Dont make things up or distort international law to impose YOUR will on everyone else. Iraq was enough!

Killing and abducting innocent people is not something that can be allowed in civil society. No one is denying that this is happening, the evidence is conclusive. The fact is that these are criminal organization committing illegal actions regardless of political views or agendas. They are committing these crimes in Colombia and retreating to safe havens across the boarders beyond the reach of Colombian authorities.

I can tell you this; if any group operating in a Latin American was considered a threat to the U.S., our armed forces would take decisive action without any apologies. I would be willing to bet that if that camp were in the middle of Caracas, not one president in Latin America would have anything to say about it. Bottom line; if a country does not want to have its boarder violated its simple, do not harbor criminals!

Something else to consider; citizens of Latin America; politics aside you all know that Colombia is bleeding internally and people dying needlessly. It is in the power of the average citizen to demand change. The “revolution” in Venezuela is an example of change by will of the people, not something I am in personal agreement with but I do understand that plight of the poor and the greed of the rich. The reality is there must be a balance between the two; bombs and abductions are not the answer.

I leave you with one last thought, while it is Colombia that is bleeding today, eventually these criminals will spread like a fungus; imagine kidnappings in Buenos Aires or Santiago. I would like to leave you with these words to the rest of South America - It was written and should server as a cold reminder to us all of a very dark time in human history.

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out -
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out -
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out -
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me - and there was no one left to speak for me.

This will spread throughout Latin America unless people speak up and stand for what is right!

PMW (AKA: Mister Gringo)

Does anybody know how many people the guerrillas have killed in colombia while they were sleeping in their houses and the guerrillas atacked them at night?

Dear Mr. Vera

I think you are mistaken in many different things. You are criticizing the president of Colombia for protecting his own people by going after the terrorists, murdering, bombing, torturing and kidnapping in his country. I think this is the elemental right of every goverment. The people of Colombia support him as one in this. Just look at the march involving millions against the Farc. His popularity is over 80%. How dare you, a person from Ecuador question the right of these people to defend themselves against a terrorist group abiding in their own country. The colombians are SICK and TIRED of the FARC and they want to see them destroyed utterly. Believe me when i write this: most of the people held hostage by the farc are mostly colombians, they are not from your country or not from France either, altough Madame Betancourt holds french citizenship as well. The colombians are DYING to get their kidnapped countrymen back. They are way more desperate then Venezuela, France or other nations. Madame Betancourt was going to be THEIR president. But everytime they tried to negotiate with the terrorists, they were the ones who lost on the deal. And it also sparked more kidnappings, the guerillas seeing that their tactic is working.