Submitted by AAA (not verified) on Fri, 02/15/2008 - 20:17.
To the Editors,
Thanks for the update of Feb 15. However, I am afraid it does not go far enough.
The whole premise of your source is built on this agency blurring out photographs of beautiful women because the government does not want people to see them.
The argument fails on two fronts. First, the Agency clearly does show their faces and the authors were selective about the pictures they showed here. Secondly, these are actresses whose faces are all over movie screens all over the country. If the government did not want their faces to be seem, it would keep their movies from showing. Clearly that is not the case.
My advise to you is not to buy into whatever some shill feeds you. Think about what you are publishing. It does not make sense to have still pictures of actresses blurred when their faces are all over the movie theater.
Also, having a blog or being a "feminist" is not enough to consider someone an expert, observer or source. Your website is being used for people with an agenda without you knowing about it. I think you should remove this article altogether.
Better luck next time.
Thanks for the update
To the Editors,
Thanks for the update of Feb 15. However, I am afraid it does not go far enough.
The whole premise of your source is built on this agency blurring out photographs of beautiful women because the government does not want people to see them.
The argument fails on two fronts. First, the Agency clearly does show their faces and the authors were selective about the pictures they showed here. Secondly, these are actresses whose faces are all over movie screens all over the country. If the government did not want their faces to be seem, it would keep their movies from showing. Clearly that is not the case.
My advise to you is not to buy into whatever some shill feeds you. Think about what you are publishing. It does not make sense to have still pictures of actresses blurred when their faces are all over the movie theater.
Also, having a blog or being a "feminist" is not enough to consider someone an expert, observer or source. Your website is being used for people with an agenda without you knowing about it. I think you should remove this article altogether.
Better luck next time.