Protests against 'brainwashing' course continue in Hong Kong

Protests outside of Hong Kong's education headquarters on Monday, September 3. Photo posted on Twitter by @galileo44.
It would be fair to say that the school year in Hong Kong has gotten off to a rocky start. Outraged over the city’s plan to require schools to introduce a controversial national history course, thousands of students, parents and teachers have taken to the streets outside Hong Kong's education headquarters, criticising the new plan as “brainwashing”.
The as-yet-undefined "national education plan", which the government says it wants schools to introduce immediately in Hong Kong’s primary and secondary schools, is set to become mandatory during the 2015/2016 school year. Hong Kong’s government has said the course is meant to encourage pride and help build a national identity.
Although demonstrations have been stirring for some months, the movement really took off on July 29, after a crowd estimated by police at 32,000 and by organisers at more than 90,000 people swarmed the city’s education headquarters.
Protesters dressed in black. Photo posted on Twitter by @helenawong.
Often dressed in black, with a length of black ribbon tied around their wrists or fixed to their clothing, the protesters have tried to maintain a constant presence outside the building. In a bid to further pressure Hong Kong’s government to withdraw the requirement, a group of around 10 demonstrators also began a hunger strike on Friday, August 31.
With no sign of the protests dying down anytime soon, Hong Kong Chief Executive CY Leung has said that it is too early to consider withdrawing the programme, while his deputy, Carrie Lam, attempted to calm concerns over the issue on Monday by urging dialogue.
Long under British rule, Hong Kong was handed back to China in 1997 and is now designated a "special autonomous region." The island has kept considerable autonomy, notably in regard to its political system. Its residents have also clung to their Cantonese culture, which many local residents fear is being overtaken by mainland Chinese cultural influences.

“It teaches kids that they should love the country and that they should say they are proud to be Chinese out loud”

Helena Wong, 27, lives in Hong Kong where she works as a freelance designer. Although no longer a student, she is one of the thousands of people who have joined the protest movement.
I was away when the protests first began in July, but when I got back to Hong Kong in August I began following news coverage of it. At one point the city’s head of education said that although there were thousands of people out demonstrating, he was confident that everyone who wasn’t speaking out actually supported his initiative. How can someone claim to represent a group of people on the basis of their non-participation? It’s nonsense. So I decided to go down to see what was going on.
Photo posted on Twitter by ‏@vivaharris.
I went for the first time on August 31. The protest organisers set up a sort of fair with different booths where you could see some of the proposed teaching materials. Some of it was surprisingly biased. I saw a set of teaching guidelines that subject matter should evoke an emotional response from students, and if a child fails to demonstrate any feelings over the national anthem, for example, then the teacher should tell them to go home and reflect upon his or herself. The curriculum teaches kids that they should love the country and that they should say that they are proud of being Chinese out loud. A lot of protesters have equated it to ‘brainwashing’. [Hong Kong education officials have reportedly issued a statement denying they have settled on a teaching manual that has been criticised for being excessively pro-Communist Party].
“The  theme of the course inherently rules out critical thought”
Even though I feel that there are a lot of cultural differences between mainland China and Hong Kong, we are all Chinese. Regardless, I don’t think this kind of programme really has a place in Hong Kong’s schools. I feel that the theme of the course inherently rules out critical thought. Worse yet, even if a child learns the material by heart, it doesn’t necessarily mean that they believe it. When they have to take a test in class, they’ll basically be asked to lie if they want to pass. It would basically teach students how not to tell the truth.
There are always at least a few thousand people out in front of Hong Kong’s education headquarters. Knowing that a lot of the demonstrators have to go to work, people take turns making sure the space is constantly occupied. People come with extra water, toilet paper, sleeping bags, tents, and things for the rain.
So far, Hong Kong’s government hasn’t really responded in any meaningful way, other than making an effort to let everyone know that it will be up to individual schools to decide how they want to phase the new subject matter into the curriculum. A number of schools have decided not to launch it yet, I think partly because of the protests and partly because of pressure from parents. The government might hold dialogue as a way to appease the public, and may even be willing to make some compromises, but I don’t think there are a lot of protesters who believe that they’ll actually revoke the initiative. Regardless, there’s a university strike planned for next Tuesday if the government doesn’t address the protesters' demands, and there are plans to keep demonstrating until they give in.



Lack of education inhibits with their goal of any respective. These grants are offered that can companies in rising and offering jobs, and to help individuals increase funds for training or different personal needs.

Dear Editors, I want to point

Dear Editors,

I want to point out that the location is not "Hong Kong Education Headquarters". There is "Hong Kong Special District Region Government HeadQuarters"

'Brainwashing' in Hong Kong

o There should be no patriotic education until there is universal suffrage and proper election in Hong Kong to legitimize the action of the Government’s Education Department.
o A government that is not representative cannot force their version of education on the children of Hong Kong opposed by the vast majority of parents (90%) and citizens (75%). It does not matter what the government or governments think.
o There are basic human rights and the rights of parents.
o This education program is also opposed to by the majority of students and teachers. Even our children know that it is wrong and refuse to participate in it and are taking the initiative to defend the dignity of those who come after them.
o It would be a fallacy to teach moral and national education when there is no consensus of a nation.
o The Communist Party of China would agree that it is a dictatorial political party in a nation. And that it is not a nation. So what is the basis of teaching moral and national education based on the idea of a political party and not a nation? The country may yet change and transform. But an ideology may not. Of all things, it would be most dangerous and unfair to the Communist Party of China. What happens when students start asking questions and teachers reply with full disclosure? It will be counter-productive to the parties concerned. These students and teachers are already doing it on the street. The Communist Party wants to provide classrooms for them to continue their discussions?
o To force education of objectively incomplete and biased materials on children against the parents’ will by a government that has only 0.014% of suffrage representation is perceived to be insulting to the entire population.
o There are also international laws on protection of children, and as mentioned, rights of parents. And Hong Kong citizens are protected by the Joint Declaration between countries.