Should Dutch Santa ditch 'racist' helper?

Photo courtesy of Chad Bilyeu.
The winter season kicked off in the Netherlands with a holiday celebrating Saint Nicolas and his little helper Zwarte Piet, or Black Peter. The bearer of gifts and sweet things, Zwarte Piet is popular with many children, but also highly controversial in the grown-up world, where some have questioned whether his blackface appearance still has a place in today’s multicultural society.
The tale of Saint Nicolas, or Sinterklaas, and Zwarte Piet is similar to that of Santa Claus. Instead of reindeer, Sinterklaas has a white horse. And in the place of elves, he has Zwarte Piet, a little man with coal-black skin. Although legend once had it that Zwarte Piet’s skin colour was due to his African origins, children today are told that he is actually covered in soot from constantly scrambling in and out of chimneys.
This year, Sinterklaas celebrations kicked up more controversy than usual. A group called “Zwarte Piet is Racist” stirred up debate in the Netherlands after staging a number of events geared toward creating a dialogue over the beloved national figure. The holiday even made international headlines after a Dutch community in New Westminster, Canada, cancelled festivities after members of the African-Canadian community said Zwarte Piet should not be included in the December 3 event.
The controversy, however, did not keep people in the Netherlands from digging out their Zwarte Piet costumes and painting their skin black come Sinterklaas day on December 5.
Photo posted on yfrog by riafleurtje.
Photo posted on Twitpic by @gewoonroom.

“Only politically correct people have a problem with Zwarte Piet”

Paul van Raalten lives in Amsterdam, where he imports Italian food products for a living.

In the Netherlands, Sinterklaas is an even bigger holiday than Christmas. In my youth, Zwarte Piet was a much more aggressive, scary character. If you misbehaved, Zwarte Piet would put you in a sack and carry you off to Spain. He also had a sack of twigs that he would lash you with as a punishment. Of course these things were never really done – it was just a story to frighten naughty children.

These days Zwarte Piet is much nicer. He gives you sweeties and throws them around everywhere. In preparation for December 5, you are supposed to put your shoes in front of the fireplace and you leave something inside for Sinterklass's white horse to eat. At night, Zwarte Piet reaches down through the chimney and leaves a present in your shoe. The next day the children are very excited when they wake up in the morning.

Of course there is a kind of discrimination against people who are different from others. It’s human nature. But Zwarte Piet isn’t about that. Only politically correct people have a problem with his character. They’re creating a problem where there isn’t one.

Luckily the Netherlands isn’t as politically correct as they are in the United States – we can make fun of the whole thing”.

“The tradition is supposed to be about inclusion and solidarity. So why do we want it to be connected with something racist from our past?"

Quinsy Gario is a poet, visual artist, and television/filmmaker, who lives in Amsterdam. He was also part of the “Zwarte Piet is Racist” project.
What we’ve been doing since June is trying to start a dialogue with people so they can get the facts about the history of Zwarte Piet. What happens a lot when you talk with people here is that they lose themselves to an emotional view. They tend to get stuck in what they see as something good from childhood, something that is intrinsically Dutch and shouldn’t be changed.
The image of Zwarte Piet first appeared in a book in 1852 as the slave of Sinterklass. This was around the same time blackface was appearing in America, and 11 years before slavery was abolished in the Netherlands. It’s also important to note that the US and the Netherlands have more than 400 years of cultural exchange between them. It was a time when racism was the norm.
Since then the figure has been changed according to the times. In 1966 Zwarte Piet was transformed into a child-like buffoon, to make him more child-friendly. In dong so, however, Zarte Piet also fulfilled the African stereotype of being simple and child-like. Later on, Zwarte Piet became pretty much Sinterklass’s manager. This new role can be linked with a mimic-man, which means he takes on the role of his one-time oppressor.
Aside from that, Zwarte Piet is shocking on a visual level. Every year the Netherlands tries to portray itself as an international, tolerant country – home of the international court, tulips, football and all that. But no one knows about Zwarte Piet, which makes you wonder are we really that proud of it?
The tradition is supposed to be about inclusion and solidarity. It’s about giving and sharing and receiving. The question is, why do we want something so beautiful to be connected with something racist from our past?”
Post written with FRANCE 24 journalist Rachel Holman.


Reply to comment | The Observers

Wоw, ѕuperb blog layout! How long havе yоu been blogging fοr?
you mаke blogging look еasy. The оverall loοk
of your site is wonderful, lеt alone the content!


...not to be presumptuous or anything, but was that directed at me? If so, I will answer your questions... Chad.

Reply to comment | The Observers

I will immediately grab your rss feed as I can not find your
email subscription hyperlink or newsletter service. Do you
have any? Please allow me realize in order that I may just
subscribe. Thanks.

Zwarte Pete "is" racist

I think zwarte pete, does come across as racist. If people of african origin are offended by it then it should go. One thing though that personally irratates me is white dutch people playing the part of black people, if netherlands people do want to keep the festivities the same perhaps they should "pay" real african people to play the part.

Actually.... the fact that

Actually.... the fact that people with all kinds of skin colours play Zwarte Piet confirms it's not (intended to be) a racial thing. Paying dark 'real' African people to play the helper is much worse i.m.o. !!

Also, as you can see Zwarte Piet is painted BLACK. Real black. Not brown, not very dark brown. But black. It considered to be inappropriat to use brown make-up since it's supposed to represent the black dust from the chimney.

The good tips additionally

The good tips additionally worked as the easy way to understand that the rest have the identical interest much like my personal own to understand more related to this issue.

A racial characterization is not intrinsically a racist act

Sinterklaas is obviously liked and thanked for bringing toys, but if you look at the littlest Dutch kids (of all races) Zwarte Piet is better loved. (He's also not "little," and he's depicted as, and respected as, a manager-type for the fairly static and elderly Saint.)

Reputable studies show that our faster-than-conscious recognition of "likely friend" and "likely foe" is set by our early exposure to racial images. That is, people who grow up without knowing dark people as friends are more likely to be anxious when confronted by a dark person. People who grow up without knowing light people as friends are more likely to be anxious when confronted by a light person. This is separate from, and in addition to, fears based on actual reality (the likelihood of someone of a different skin tone actually causing you injury or harm).

Now, we might ideally wish that all kids grew up with friends of all colors, shapes and cultures, so that they would be free of irrational fears. But while the Netherlands is multicultural in the larger cities, it's still rather a monoculture in many smaller towns. Given the current, non-mocking, non-denigrating depiction of Zwarte Piet, I suspect that, on balance, it's probably helpful for a lot of little white children to be raised feeling an automatic outpouring of love for a "black" man, and to feel comfortable and happy in a cluster of "black" men.

Remember, all of this happens in the context of a Sinterklaas (and indeed, a Piet) who can be any race or gender, under the costume. (You can and do see female sinterklaasen, and various races; ditto for the Piets). Children are told that these are all "help-Sinterklaases" (or help-Piets, often with specified roles). It's as if Santa Claus had a lot of understudies, who didn't all have to look like the jolly round white guy in the Currier and Ives print.

In that context, the blackface seems like a minor issue. Like objecting to a white actor playing Othello in a theater company who also is equally likely to have a black man (or a black woman) playing Hamlet or Lear. To be as inclusive and multiracial as the Dutch, the rest of the world has a lot of catching up to do.

The complaints seem

The complaints seem trivial,the issue absurd

Zwart Piet controversy

I see nothing wrong with bringing children joy and excitement during the holidays. Clearly, the Dutch mean nothing racist by this character. In the USA a number of years ago a black woman was dating a Caucasian man. We have what are called "Celebrity Roasts." It is done in the spirit of fun. But, on this particular roast the man decided to dress in black-face to make her laugh, which it did. However the oh too politically correct people began to protest and it was all over the media. They saw this as racist. The girlfriend did not see it as anything but funny. No one was hurt and most roasts do not get so much controversy. The man actually had difficulty finding acting jobs for awhile. Sometimes people need to mind their own business with these types of issues and become active in issues like famine, India's tradition of gendercide as they don't want to have girls due to dowries. genocide in countries, etc.


Quinsy Gario may be a poet but where is the proof for his accusation, historical or poetic, that Sinterklaas is keeping slaves? Zwarte Piet is not a slave does not behave like slave and does not show slave-mentality. Zwarte Piet is black indeed yes, very black - but that is not enough to qualify as a slave.

Historically slaves are of all colour - the white slaves held by the Sultan in Morocco were often from Holland.