The sheer servility of the French print media has to be experienced to be believed. When, for example, it emerged that a former president had set up his mistress with a seat in the European Parliament, French readers were wholly dependent on foreign reports. The same was true of many of François Mitterand’s peccadilloes, both sexual and political. Not until after he died was his Vichyite past openly discussed.

When Jacques Chirac pardoned more than a thousand politicians who had been found guilty of corruption, no French newspaper so much as alluded to the fact that they had been accused. Indeed, when Nigel Farage, the UKIP leader, pointed out that one of these politicians had been nominated as a European Commissioner, he was told by the President of the European Parliament to withdraw his remarks or risk prosecution.

Some foreigners laugh at the feebleness of French journalists. Others admire it. “Why can’t we be as grown-up as the French about these things?” say go-ahead metropolitan types. But the obsequiousness of French newspapers isn’t determined by their readers’ preferences. On the contrary, in few democracies do voters express such vehement contempt for their elected representatives. No, the reason that French reporters tend to lay off their politicians is because they have a symbiotic relationship with the government. They enjoy tax breaks and other perks, many of their newspapers are related to one or another of the political parties, and privacy laws are loaded against them.

They therefore frequently find themselves at odds with their readers. When France voted on the European Constitution five years ago, every newspaper except the Communist daily called for a Yes vote, leaving the No campaign to les bloggeurs. Guess who won?

Web-based news outlets are contributing to the decline of print media in the English-speaking world. In France, where a journalistic cartel has become reliant on political patronage, their opportunity is commensurately greater. Truly the Internet is a wonderful phenomenon.

Two of the six Jews are supposed to be prosecuted. What did the other four do that the other two didn't? This is just a logical observation. However, this isn't what's really at hand is it? The political members of the Geneva Convention, if they've seen this video most probably rolled on the floor laughing their heads off and found it extremely funny and the Jewish military too. This is not something that will go further than pen and paper. Had a group of Palestinian soldiers been caught doing it, what do you think would have happened? Does anybody remember the end scene in Jackie Chan's "Who Am I?" where the police force and the military chased that corrupt agent on land, sea and air? They would have probably received the same treatment and worse and the media would have printed, for the world to see and written in the papers the usual lies and rubbish to make the brain washed and simply absorbent citizens believe what they read. How can something like this be harmless fun or classed as tongue in cheek when a usurped occupation and the innocent lives of men women and children are murdered and executed on a daily basis because of the same comedians in the first place? Has war now all of a sudden become comedy and a joke, like the drugs, sex and rock and roll and the extermination of the “Gooks” in the Vietnam War? It’s ok for the Jews and the Zionists to have a little fun because they are well equipped with bodily armour, tanks, RPG’s, machine guns and arsenal of every kind. They don’t wake up every morning to have a bulldozer as an alarm clock ripping their homes apart and concrete rubble falling on the children as the heroic Jewish soldiers take a man’s wife and take it in turns to butt her with their rifles and rape her as her husband watches then finally killing whomsoever they please. This is after all just a little fun, the media want us to believe but the “Anti Semitists” oh no, they are to be feared and warned against. They do and have done things we cannot comprehend even though they have done nothing, committed no crimes and tortured no one except the only “Crime” they have committed is to hate what the Jews do. And that’s a crime but what they do is acceptable! The speechlessness of such a belief and the incredulity of such minds that are upon this way of thinking is beyond the ability of human conception to grasp the monstrosity and gravity of such beings, what they stand for and the heinous crimes they commit. Know of a surety that death comes to us all and the Judge of judges will reward you what He has promised those who commit such crimes.

Children love to dance. Adults when they feel pure, innocent and free also love to dance. Dancing is a form of stress release. Whether it is the structured forms of the waltz, dervish, swing or ballroom to the unstructured forms of techno and trance it is a divine blessing. Only the stiffest and most restrictive of cultures abhors dancing. It doesn't matter if this was a set up. It is refreshing to see. The IDF should not investigate them. The young soldiers were probably very aware of the surrounding dangers. It was only a minute out of their day. Some light must be injected into grave situations at times. Switching the dynamic acts as a catalyst to other potentialities. King David liked to dance didn't he ? Of course he knew there was a time to dance and a time to make war. I would like to see much more dancing in the Holy Land. I’m sure the Arabs like to boogie as well.

Joel,I got to hand it to you,youre one smooth anti semite.