
The world's long-time supreme winemaker, France has slipped from first place to third among wine exporters in the past four years, leaving Italy and Spain in the lead. At the same time, wines from the New World are going from strength to strength. The major difference - marketing. Our Observer, a Frenchman studying the business of wine in Australia, explains.
Benoît Pétry, 24, from Nice, is studying the wine business at Adelaide University, Australia.

While French wines are finding themselves increasingly out of favour with the world, the number of wine-producing countries is increasing (it is expected that world wine production will increase by 4% between 2008-2012). Who would have thought that while wine production in India, China and Argentina is increasing, in France it's declining? These countries are increasing their share in the most important wine markets (e.g., the UK and the US). The New World is gaining shares through big wine companies (like Constellation and Foster's). These companies are successful because they're big enough to be able to invest heavily in marketing, and they provide the distribution sector with a constant supply of wine that sustains a relatively constant taste and quality.
Marketing is the New World's best weapon in challenging the Old World. French producers are not the best when it comes to marketing strategies, and they keep on selling wine like they always have. The most obvious difference is the way the New World labels its products: simple, easy to read and consumer friendly; you do not have to be an expert to know how to read the label. The New World labelling system is not restricted by law like it is in France.
French wine experts place more emphasis on the region where the wine was produced than on the type of grape, as if the terroir were the most important factor when it comes to the taste of wine. Of course, nobody can deny that the terroir is an important factor, but it is the grape variety that really makes the taste of the wine. If you add more Merlot or Cabernet franc to Cabernet Sauvignon (a common mix) and plant it in exactly the same vineyard as a differently proportioned blend, the wine will have a very different taste. The New World, however, has lessened the importance of the terroir notion (climate, soil type, length of exposure to sunlight) and increased the importance of grape variety.
While you won't often find the grape variety on a French bottle (see pic), Australian wineries always display the grape type and not necessarily the region. Consumers love that! First, it's easier to understand; what is in the bottle is no longer a mystery. It is the French government based AOC system, or "controlled term of origin" which regulates how wineries present their product. Each AOC is a region in France which is certified for a certain production (for example, Côte du Rhône, Champagne, Châteauneuf-du-Pape).
Xavier de Eizaguirre, president of the international wine exposition Vinexpo, argued that with about 500 AOCs in total, the system is perceived as too complicated. In the AOC region of Châteauneuf-du-Pâpe for example, growers are allowed to use 12 different types of grape. Only an absolute expert would be able to determine a wine from knowing its AOC.
Wine is indeed a complex product, characterized by different attributes such as region, variety of grape, winemaker, winery and wine style. And that's exactly why a bottle of wine should help the consumer - connoisseur or not - to get all the basic information related to the wine in the bottle in order to help them to buy a bottle of wine that they are more likely to enjoy, and therefore buy more of."
French wines
Australian wines
Comments
French wine labels
Submitted by Mike Lloyd (not verified) on Sun, 17/05/2009 - 10:13.I've experienced both ends of the spectrum as far as Loire wine makers are concerened (I live in Saumur AOC region). At one end when I commented to a very good wine maker about his old fashioned labels when he asked me about selling his wine in England: "My wine speaks for itself" I couldn't convince him that he has to get people to buy the stuff before making a judgment about the quality. At the other end, I queried another excellent wine maker about why the non standard Loire shape bottle: "It gives the wine waiter something to talk about when showing the wine plus it makes people look twice at the label and bottle."
Marketing has never been a French thing
Submitted by Charles Monroe (not verified) on Sat, 16/05/2009 - 22:27.The French are great at lots of things, including working nearly half as much as other countries and sleeping more than any other modern nation on earth (this is actual data, look it up online). That is a sad position to stay in the lead for anything and any industry. The collapse of most French industries is only a matter of time and the wine industry will die off.
Regarding the designs on the labels, they all look like they were from the 1940s. There are few French wine producers that understand modern marketing.
Old World Vs New World
Submitted by Benoît Pétry on Mon, 04/05/2009 - 02:55.Thanks all for your comments.
As this article is focusing on labelling. I would be very interested to know your opinion about Old World Vs New World labels. Talking about quality, price, wine style, etc. is another topic.
Of course, I know that it is very important and I agree these are the main attributes of a bottle of wine. Nonetheless, labelling is also an attribute which deserves a specific interest. The "sexyness" of the labels is one thing, but the main objective is to give the relevant information to the consumer.
So, what do you think when you have a French, Italian, German, Spanish bottle of wine? do you think you get enough information to make the right choice?
What do you like about New World labels?
Thank you
Benoit
Old World Vs New World
Submitted by Unregistered user (not verified) on Fri, 22/05/2009 - 17:44.Much printed information on the label of a bottle of wine tends to be unreliable. I find that it means nothing to tell me what grape(s) are used. There is far too much variation. Indeed I find it much more useful to choose wines based on region, particularly from France. "Burgundy" tells me something. "Bordeaux" tells me something. So does "Tuscany" and "Rioja". Unfortunately, "Sonoma Valley" tells me nothing at all. In fact, most New World labels tell me nothing.
My sense of the matter is that Old World makers still have some sense of regional identity that translates into the wine. New world makers, in spite of making much of their region, too often seem to turn out wines that could all come from the same barrel. So, I tend to not like anything about New world labels, because too often I do not like the wine.
Not Enough Information
Submitted by Unregistered user (not verified) on Thu, 21/05/2009 - 20:30.I think there is very little information on wine bottles from Europe. I know that the little pink ribbon on the Italian wines means that it has been tasted and tested and is a good bottle, but this does not tell me what is in the bottle.
french wine
Submitted by Frank V Arnold (not verified) on Wed, 29/04/2009 - 09:12.I live in UK and have drunk wine for many decades but do not pretend to be an expert. However I now rarely buy French, Italian, or Spanish wine. This is not because of poor marketing but because of dishonest marketing. I am not able to afford the best wines, but will not buy "plonk" either. When I buy European wines within my price range I know that I am buying poor quality which is being sold as good quality. The merchants are trading on the belief that the brand is all that matters. The other dishonest trading strategy is using "jazzed up" labels to attract the unwary.
Most of my purchases are Australian; I know which producers I like (eg. Hardy) and which grapes I do not like (eg. I avoid Merlot). I have never had a bad Australian wine. In contrast I have had many many very poor French and Italian wines. If I want to drink good Italian wine then I go to Italy and buy like an Italian (I am half Italian); the same may be true in France.
Until honesty returns to the European wine trade I shall continue to avoid it.
French Wine
Submitted by Unregistered user (not verified) on Sun, 03/05/2009 - 17:51.In reply to Mr Frank V Arnold, regarding the dishonesty of the European wine industry, as a wine drinking Brit who lives in France, I respectfully suggest that half Italian Frank learns to spot the parts of the British wine industry that are dishonest. Mr Arnold should take his own advice and cross the channel and drink the wines of France, Italy and Spain in their contries of origin and I am sure that he will immediately stop slagging off an entire industry because of a handful of dishonest traders pandering to those Brits who are known throught the world as gullable enough to fall for any good marketing wheeze!
For inexperienced and
Submitted by Unregistered user (not verified) on Tue, 28/04/2009 - 22:49.For inexperienced and supermarket shoppers your comments are correct. Most new world wines taste like flavoured alcohol and will not be bought by experienced drinkers at any price. Terroir is more important than variety - in fact it decides variety at the quality wine-taste end. It is unimportant in commercial fruit bomb wines made by big companies with large advertising and image creating capabilities.
Ill informed comment
Submitted by unregistered user (not verified) on Wed, 29/04/2009 - 06:24.The article is well argued - though I may disagree with parts of it - over all it presents a view.
The first reply however exposes the writer as ill-informed. It is very, very far from true that ALL New World wines taste like flavoured alcohol. The writer of this comment should, perhaps, expose him/herself to a wider range of wines.
I would agree that French marketing has been woeful - however I put forward a parallel thesis.
My observations (having been in both the Trade and the Industry for thirty seven years), are that the new generation of drinkers began experimenting with wine in the mid 80s. They struggled with the leaner wines of France, many of which were not well made. Some one then bought an Australian Shiraz - a Napa Merlot - a Marlborough Sauvignon and on opening they were "assaulted" by the fruit flavour. Sunshine in a bottle.
Yes, often these wines lacked elegance and finesse but they were immediately appealing. In those days they were not fruit-bombs - forward fruit, but still well made and well structured. The people drinking them were not sophisticated or informed wine drinkers with trained palates - they wanted simply to ENJOY the wine.
They voted with their wallets.
Today the vast majority of French wines have not changed. The wine makers of France have ignored their market - ignored the preferences of their customers. If you wish to buy a motor car in red - would you accept a blue one? No, and neither do the wine drinking customers ... you ignore their preferences at your peril.
I love the best French wines (and European wines) - the best have fruit, depth, elegance and finesse - as all great wines must have ... without compare. However in the "value" range the wines from the same regions are often poorly made and do not reflect the terroir as their betters do. They are made to a price and also, often, heavily subsidised by their national taxman. Most New World wines are unsubsidised and have to pay for transportation halfway round the world to boot.
Oh, by the way first poster, if supermarkets are such an anathema to you, why do you shop there yourself?
I believe it's ill informed
Submitted by Unregistered user (not verified) on Wed, 29/04/2009 - 04:44.I believe it's ill informed to say that "terroir is more important than variety" - the two go hand in hand. Terroir really governs how you decide to grow a variety, so long as it is suitable. I don't know anybody who buys wine only because it comes from a certain terroir - and they are some serious wine drinkers. BTW I own 2 vineyards & a winery in the Adelaide Hills (Australia) so i do know a little.