The use of a high-pitched alarm to drive British teenagers away from public places is under dispute on the blogosphere after a campaign against the alarms was launched by the Children's Commissioner for England yesterday. The ‘mosquito' alarm which is so high-pitched that only young ears are able to pick it up has been installed by 3,500 shopkeepers and supermarkets in the UK since it was invented in 2005. Now, the ‘Buzz off' campaign says that the £500 product should be prohibited from use.
24 and younger:
60 and younger:
Youths have turned the use of the alarms around- by using the noise as a ring tone on their mobile phones. You can download the tones, depending on your age, in order to be able to acknowledge text messages and calls in the classroom or an exam.
Comment from Jade Bailey, 15-years-old:

Anyway, wait till the MPs realise their kids are affected too."
Blog posted by ‘Simon J’ 11 February 2008:

Blog posted by ‘Jim’ 12 February 2008:

Posted on flickr by 'wibbler', 27 July 2007
Comments
Yep if you are under age we
Submitted by Unregistered user (not verified) on Sat, 02/08/2008 - 01:25.Yep if you are under age we really do not care if you consider yourself more dignified than a border collie. You are part of a nuisance age group, and whether you are the reason that group has that stereotype or not, is irrelevant.
The only thing that matters to most of us is that we would rather just make it easy and oust every one of you.
Moral Corruption
Submitted by Unregistered user (not verified) on Thu, 04/09/2008 - 09:42.Wow, what a psycho little twat! If you were a teenager like me, this wouldn't sound very appealing to you. I wouldn't classify myself as an 'irresponsible youth' at all, and I never loiter, but I remember that there was a test of one of these 'repellants' going on where I usually shop, and it hurts to go near it! It is an indiscriminatory move against all teenagers, regardless of whether they are misbehaving or not. It makes it impossible for people like me to go anywhere near the shop, even if I have intentions to purchase something, or be responsible, which I always do. There are much better ways to do this than violate human rights. This is disgusting.
I can't hear the 18 and under sound!
Submitted by Anonyme (not verified) on Wed, 14/05/2008 - 20:13.And neither can most people I know.
And it's not annoying anyways. Maybe a slight earache but nothing else.
I'd just put my mp3 player on and ignore it anyhow.
LOL I forgot to write that
Submitted by Anonyme (not verified) on Wed, 14/05/2008 - 20:13.LOL I forgot to write that I'm 12.
i dont think its anoying i
Submitted by michael / age 15 (not verified) on Thu, 01/05/2008 - 22:46.i dont think its anoying i like it, but my frends go crazy when i play it it's, like a screach buzz mix.
I think people are opposing
Submitted by Justice (not verified) on Wed, 12/03/2008 - 17:53.I think people are opposing just for the sake of opposing.
The Kids Commissioner Albert Aynsley-Green is just doing it for his fame.
- The Mosquito™ is not a weapon.
- The Mosquito™ is not painful – it is simply annoying to those who can hear it.
- The Mosquito™ will not make people run away from an area – it will simply annoy those who can hear it - eventually causing them to move away.
- The Mosquito™ will not cause hearing damage.
I'm 33 and I can hear all
Submitted by Anonyme (not verified) on Wed, 13/02/2008 - 21:31.I'm 33 and I can hear all the sound. Does that make me some kind of genius?
no just young in the head
Submitted by Anonyme (not verified) on Tue, 19/02/2008 - 18:48.no just young in the head
my friend jade
Submitted by Anonyme (not verified) on Wed, 13/02/2008 - 14:32.JADE BAILEY.
WHAT A LEGEND!
Frann
xxxxxxxx
mosquito age pest defender
Submitted by Anonyme (not verified) on Sat, 16/02/2008 - 08:52.I am 56 and can clearly hear the tone for people aged 24 and younger - but that for under 18's is still almost inaudible - but sensed. The sound for 60 yrs and younger is very bad, as if I'd had a blow to the head and still had ringing in my ears. To think this is considered audible only to under 18's is wrong - the sound is still discernable, and is a public nuisance. For this reason the devices should be withdrawn from sale. As the previous person said, anything that discriminates against people - in a public place - on grounds of age, gender, religion, colour etc. is wrong and against the widely held standard of human rights.
Jane (france)